Whipped Cream Difficulties

Garden city of Washington state.

Brad Thoma was a sergeant with the Spokane Police Department up until 2009. That year, he was charged with driving while intoxicated and hit and run: apparently, he hit a pickup with his personal vehicle and fled the scene.

Thoma received “deferred adjudication” in the case, which basically meant that if he kept his nose clean for a certain amount of time, the charges would go away. As part of the agreement, he had to have an ignition interlock installed on any vehicles he drove, according to state law at the time. This would be awfully inconvenient to put on a police car, so Thoma was offered a non-driving desk job. He turned down that offer, so the Spokane PD fired his butt.

Now we’re in 2012. Thoma, of course, complained after he was fired, and the “Washington State Human Rights Commission” negotiated a settlement in which Thoma would be rehired as a detective and get $275,000 in back pay.

The Spokane City Council, in their infinite wisdom, rejected the settlement.

And Thoma is suing, claiming he was discriminated against due to his disability, namely alcoholism.

If you want to read the FARK discussion, I’d recommend hitting yourself repeatedly with a ball peen hammer until the urge goes away. If it doesn’t go away, the thread is here.

And, yes, I usually don’t cover stuff that is on FARK, but:

1. Mike the Musicologist sent it to me as blog fodder, and

b. It reminded me of another former Spokane police officer that I hadn’t checked on recently. So how’s Karl F. Thompson Jr. doing these days? (You remember former officer Thompson, don’t you? He beat Otto Zehm to death.)

Well…

• Former officer Thompson still hasn’t been sentenced. A date hasn’t been set yet.
• Former officer Thompson says that he’s “taken responsibility” for his actions, and is requesting a reduced sentence. Sentencing guidelines call for a sentence of between 27 and 33 months, but Thompson is requesting that his sentence be reduced to below that level. Originally, the prosecution was asking for a sentence of between six to eight years.
• Former officer Thompson is still seeking a new trial; this time, his attorneys are claiming that the expert testimony of a witness was “mischaracterized” by the prosecutors.
• “A special panel – including a former U.S. attorney, a retired state Supreme Court chief justice and others – is set to investigate the Spokane Police Department’s use-of-force training and practices next month in a review that will extend beyond the Zehm case.”

Here is a particularly noteworthy quote:

Although the state’s top police trainer concluded that the fatal 2006 confrontation with unarmed janitor Otto Zehm was indefensible, the department’s own instructors and the city’s legal advisers have insisted that Spokane police officers were justified and handled the encounter appropriately.

• The Zehm family has agreed to mediation with the city in their lawsuit.
• The city is considering the use of body cameras. I’m not sure how much good that would have done in this case; there was video evidence of what happened (that’s what hung Thompson). And one of the major issues (as I see it) is the city’s instance that everything that happened was proper and consistent with the Spokane PD’s operating procedures.
• Here’s a great example of karma coming back around:
  

  A Spokane police officer who says he feared for his life after being threatened by a felon was asked in court Wednesday about supportive comments he posted on a Facebook page in support of another convicted felon – former Officer Karl Thompson.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, February 29th, 2012 at 11:05 am and is filed under Clippings, Cops, Law. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.