Every once in a while, instead of being all snarky and stuff, we like to ask you to go out and read something else on the Internet that we think is interesting or important or both.
“the depression thing” by Zach Holman.
Therapy basically got me rubber duck debugging myself. Even when I’m not programming I’m fucking programming, I can’t get away from it, ha. But it’s true: the mere notion that I’d have to discuss my life with someone else later meant that I became far better at self-analysis than I ever had been.
That was one of the many neat realizations I had during this whole experience. Therapy tricks you into becoming better at therapy.
After the jump, this week’s TMQ…
…which comes in at about 5,600 words. Of those, the first thousand repeat one of TMQ’s recurring themes, which can be summarized as “End tax breaks for the NFL! And college football, too!”
You can now skip all that, but there are a few points worth engaging on:
- TMQ continues to be confused about the NFL’s former “non-profit” status. As we and other smarter people have pointed out to Easterbrook many times in the past, that status did not mean the NFL was a “charity”: rather, it meant that the NFL did not keep any money above and beyond their operating expenses, and distributed the excess back to the 32 NFL teams. This is not an uncommon form of “non-profit”.
- “Josh Kosman details another odious tax break to the NFL: owners can depreciate the cost of buying teams.” What is the depreciation schedule for an NFL team?
- “But whenever government confers tax breaks, either taxes on average people must rise, or debt must grow. So why is college sports subsidized by the tax code?” Or government must cut spending, something that never occurs to Easterbrook. And as always, TMQ characterizes allowing people to keep more of their own money as a “subsidy”.
- “Ohio State football’s educational performance is laughable. In the most recent year posted by the NCAA, for students entering as freshmen in 2009, just 47 percent of Ohio State football players graduated, versus 83 percent of all Ohio State students under the same metric.” Is there a good reason, beyond TMQ’s preference, why Ohio State’s tax deductions should be tied to athlete’s academic performance?
Stats. Sweet: Miami. Sour: the New York Football Giants before last Sunday. Mixed: New England – Jets. Two point conversions good.
That’s certainly an optimistic view of human nature, to say the least.
Remember how we mentioned the first 1,000 words (roughly 1/5th) of this week’s TMQ were about tax breaks? Well, approximately the next 1,500 words are about…the prevalence of TV shows depicting traitors. Really. We are not making this up.
…
Presuming movie and TV subliminal effects are not confined to cigarettes and guns…
In other words, “Presuming this thing, which I just stated there is no clear conclusion on…”
Sure you won the Super Bowl less than two years ago. But what have you done for us lately?
That would be, “played badly and lost to a previously 0-5 team,” Gregg.
More sweet: da Bears, Pittsburgh. The Cleveland Browns are bad: alert the media.
TMQ used to write that since basketball was 1% as interesting as football, he devoted 1% of his column space each year to it. Apparently, this week is that 1%.
Most Football Teams Don’t Practice Letting the Opponent Score.
American Football Gods. (Neil Gaiman, call your office, please.)
“Adventures in Officiating”: you guessed it, the Jets.
No it wasn’t, Gregg. The NFL officials explanations of the rule and why the call was reversed are quite clear. You may disagree with the rules, or think the replay evidence wasn’t good enough, but that doesn’t change the facts.
Also: Eagles-Panthers.
…
A week ago Hell’s Sports Bar was doing a lively trade in pitchers of craft-brewed brimstone…
“brimstone” is another name for sulfur, which is a chemical element, so “craft-brewed brimstone” is nonsensical.
To recap: televised depictions of traitors in government bad. Jokes about animal abuse good.
The 500 Club. The 600 Club. Mount Ida 14, Dean 7.
Oh, so injuries get you out of your predictions? Good to know.
That’s a wrap for this week. Tune in next week for more exciting discussions of TV shows and tax policy.