Happy 2016. After the jump, this week’s TMQ…
585 words down.
Don’t you mean, “back on the streets”?
(And somebody is seriously arguing that Denver should start Brock Osweiler.)
Does interest in football really decline when the playoffs start? How would we know this? Television ratings, maybe?
Sweet: Denver. Sour: New England. Stats.
“How Oregon Self-Destructed.” We were out at dinner with friends Saturday night and missed this game, though we do recall hearing TCU was down by 31 at one point. So when we got up Sunday morning and saw the final score, we were a bit surprised. What happened? “Inexplicably, Oregon stayed in its ultra-quick-snap offense, rather than huddling up to work the clock.”
College games aren’t close because big college teams book cupcake opponents.
TMQ’s wild-card round summary: the Bengals are too conservative, Green Bay “just does not have it this year”, Duane Brown’s injury hurts the Texans, Kansas City has a good shot at winning (especially without Jamaal Charles), Minnesota can’t pass, Pittsburgh is pass-wacky, Seattle has to win on the road (actually, Seattle needs to win at Minnesota, where the temperature is estimated to be one), and Washington has already scored a moral victory just by being in the playoffs.
Hell’s Sports Bar is closed. We hope permanently. Ryan Fitzpatrick. Chicken-(salad) kicking: San Diego, Michigan State, Oklahoma State.
Which Hollywood robot should play The Upshot’s 4th Down Bot in a big-budget theatrical biopic?
Seriously, New York Times editors?
This was the year of quarterback turmoil. TCU’s statuary authority.
…209 staff members in its athletic department versus 43 staff members in its history department.
Question: is it just maybe remotely possible that comparing an entire athletic department which supports 20 teams by our count (including a women’s rifle team, which we think is awesome, but where’s the men’s team?) to a single academic department is kind of like comparing apples to oranges?
Because in the world of TMQ, cutting government spending in response to lower revenues is unheard of.
Authentic games. “The new perspective forecasts an all-animal Super Bowl of Panthers versus Broncos.” Keep that in mind, folks.
And last but not least, TMQ grids his Chip Kelly axe.
T.M.Q. started this running item back in October, and already Kelly is out the door.
And reports are that he’s attracting a lot of interest from other NFL teams.
So he came from an environment where 30 point walkovers were common…
…and posted 30 point walkovers in his first two seasons. (The Eagles did struggle this year.)
Does TMQ have any idea what happens in college programs that don’t win?
So basically what TMQ is saying is that Jeff Fisher is a not even mediocre coach who’s managed to sucker the media and his employers? As one of TMQ’s commenters points out, Kelly has a better winning percentage in his three seasons than Fisher has in his 21 seasons, and made it to the playoffs in his first season (Fisher didn’t until his sixth). That doesn’t seem like the point TMQ was trying to make, but it seems like a valid interpretation.
Seriously, it seems that Easterbrook sometimes gets an overwhelming desire for someone to fail (Kelly being the most recent example) and distorts reality in his column in an attempt to make it so. Someone should be calling him on this.
And that’s a wrap for this week. Tune in next week, when we hope to be more clever and more on-time.
[…] Well. Chip Kelly is the new coach of the San Francisco 49ers. This should make Gregg Easterbrook’s head explode. […]