We hope all of our readers had a good Christmas, and that Santa or Krampus brought you everything you wanted. Sadly, Robot Santa Claus failed to bring us everything we wanted, as far too many of our enemies remain alive. Maybe in 2016. Or maybe we should submit our wish list to Morbo.
It looks like TMQ got what he wanted; a Panthers loss. Does this mean what we fear it means? After the jump, this week’s TMQ…
More missed point-after kicks this year, with the new rules.
Huh? As one of the commenters points out, that’s a 60% increase.
No, they do not. TMQ’s own link in that item even says so. At least the NYT seems to have made Easterbrook ditch the auto-text, though.
Sweet: Arizona.
We’ll take “Keeping people like TMQ from saying the Packers had given up” for $600, Alex.
Sour: Miami.
This week in unrealistic movies: “Hunger Games”, “Star Wars”, and “Star Trek”. Spoilers within. And if you want to read a good economic analysis of the “Star Wars” universe, may we recommend “Overthinking It”: part 1. Part 2.
Stats.
Our heart bleeds for the poor college football players. Who, by the way, are probably on break anyway. (For example, the last day of classes at Texas A&M this year appears to have been December 16th, and classes don’t start again until January 19th.)
From what we recall in our reading of a book by some guy named Easterbrook, those gift bags the bowl participants get (depending on the size and prestige of the bowl) are actually pretty swell.
The SI cover curse. The Pro Bowl has too many quarterbacks and running backs. Duke sucks. Hell’s Sports Bar. (At least it’s not actual this week.)
Yes, Gregg, you’re right: it can be one way or the other. People can think some religious symbols are okay, while others are not. TMQ might not agree – heck, we might not agree – but that’s certainly a position people could take. It is, at least, debatable whether public policy requires consistency. We prefer that it does, but that’s just our opinion.
At least the football gods aren’t chortling this week. We interpret the Boobie Dixon quote, not as empty boasting, but as stating “This game against the Jets is important for us, because they’re a major division rival, this is our shot at going .500, and we’ve already beaten them once.” Also: 7-8 is “awful”? What does that make San Diego?
Speaking of the Jets, why are they better? (Fitzpatrick, Marshall, and no Ryan.) Tight ends. Why are the Redskins better? No Bobby Three Sticks. And speaking of same…
Maybe. We hope so. But we won’t bet the family farm on it.
Authentic games. Need we say more? Why did Belichick kick? Plus: coin toss rules are overly complex. And TMQ goes on for another 522 after the “overly complex” point, lending credence to what he’s saying.
Chicken-(salad) kicking: Dallas. And that’s a wrap for this week. But it looks like TMQ just got a belated Christmas present, so we’ll be waiting impatiently for next week’s column.