Have you ever had one of those days when you don’t want to even look at the newspaper, or do much of anything except curl up in a ball and shut out the world?
Yeah. Us too. After the jump, this week’s TMQ…
Oh, Ghu. The Authentic Games Index is back.
536 words down.
Another reason the N.F.L. should switch to a seeded-tournament format.
Or maybe another reason to be glad the postseason doesn’t begin today.
The Cleveland Browns are the Cleveland Browns. But:
We’re curious how this would happen. Is TMQ suggesting that players might deliberately underperform so FanDuel makes money? Or that coaches might bench key players for the benefit of DraftKings? To put it another way…
Tight ends: Cincinnati, New England. What the actual hell, Green Bay? Stats.
Assuming that this is the quote in question, Plato supposedly attributed it to Socrates, but there’s no evidence that either of them actually said it.
Without passing judgment on the legitimacy (or lack thereof) of these complaints: respect is earned. It is not an entitlement.
And isn’t it a shame that whole families have to be torn apart by something as simple as wild dogs?
Dance dance rush.
Is the defense budget ultimately paying for this, too?
You know, at first blush, that sounds like a really good question. And it is true at some level that the defense budget is paying for Raytheon’s sponsorship of the Patriots. But let’s think about this some more: is TMQ’s position that Raytheon isn’t entitled to make money off of their government contracts? Or that Raytheon is making too much money if they can afford to give some to the Patriots? What’s a reasonable profit for Raytheon to make? Aren’t their contracts subject to competitive bidding? If they are making “too much profit”, can’t someone come along and undercut them?
TMQ’s “defense budget is paying for this” argument is superficially compelling, even to us as libertarians. But if you think about it, rather than just letting your buttons be pushed, we’re not sure it holds up.
T.M.Q. continues to think Chip Kelly will skedaddle to the collegiate ranks…
Which is amusing, since the talk this week was that he might be “traded” to the Titans.
…where football coaches are little gods and players say naught but “yes, sir.”
Well, that’s one way of looking at it. Another way of looking at is to say that Kelly weeded out a bunch of players who were underperforming from the Eagles roster.
“T.M.Q. Is Looking for Corporate Sponsors for My Proposed Fiasco Bowl.” Well, we had one in mind, but were deeply disappointed to find out the Bitcoin Bowl is no more. “The Beef O’Brady’s Fiasco Bowl”? Does kind of have a ring to it…
Chicken-(salad) kicking: New England. Bad blitzing: Seattle. Sexy Rexy Ryan.
Quoted at length for reasons:
Yeah, Fuente may be a weasel. But it is also worth considering that Easterbrook views Frank Beamer with something almost like worship: Beamer let Easterbrook follow the team around, with “no restrictions”, for the 2011 season, and Easterbrook spends much of his book The King of Sports: Why Football Must Be Reformed discussing his experiences with Beamer’s team. Point being, TMQ may have more of an ax to grind here than just Fuente ducking out of a contract. (And how loyal would Memphis have been to Fuente?)
More chicken-(salad) kicking: Oklahoma State.
We thought the only fact you needed was: which team has a better band?
500 Club, 500 Club, 700 Club. Strong 2 Clubs.
Wesley Wolverines 42, Johns Hopkins Blue Jays 37.
That’s all for this week. We still have hopes that Carolina will win out, and TMQ’s 1972 Miami Dolphins auto-text will go into the trash where it belongs.