Clayton Cramer also questions this, and links to a blog post by John Fund on “National Review Online”:
Fund also points out that:
- This figure includes transfers between family members and inherited guns, which Obama’s proposal would not touch.
- “…the federal survey simply asked buyers if they thought they were buying from a licensed firearms dealer. While all Federal Firearm Licensees do background checks, only those perceived as being FFLs were counted. Yet, there is much evidence that survey respondents who went to the smallest FFLs, especially the “kitchen table” types, had no idea that the dealer was actually ‘licensed.’ Many buyers seemed to think that only “brick and mortar” stores were licensed dealers, and so the survey underestimating the number of sales covered by the checks.”
Fund quotes John Lott as believing the actual percentage of firearms transferred in private sales is less than 10%.
In addition, Clayton Cramer his own self has a post over at NRO about the “gun show loophole”:
There’s also a longer Clayton Cramer post, touching on many of the same points, over at PJ Media.
(Hattip on this to Sebastian. As long as we’re talking about private transfers (and since Sebastian stepped up and gave his own example), I’ll talk about my experience. In my entire gun owning life, I’ve had four transfers that didn’t go through an FFL. Three of those were presents (birthday or Christmas) from family members – my brother, father, and stepfather – which, as noted, would not be affected by Obama’s proposal. Transfer number four was a purchase by me of several guns from a private party who inherited them after the death of a parent. I wrote up two copies of an agreement with the serial number, make and model, and price paid for each gun, kept one and gave the sellers the other. I also gave them a photocopy of my driver’s license. In addition, the sellers were people I had known personally for close to 20 years at the time of the purchase. All of my other purchases have gone through an FFL.)