Archive for November 11th, 2010

Sigh.

Thursday, November 11th, 2010

There are two things I generally avoid.

  1. Reading articles linked from the FARK politics tab, and the FARK comment threads on those articles. I don’t need more rage in my life.
  2. Blogging about health care, and health care reform. Look, I think the system has major problems. I wish I knew how to fix it. I don’t. I think things are too deeply intertwingled for there to be a single easy fix, or even a series of easy fixes. I’m worried that once you start tugging on the pieces, the entire thing will collapse like a giant game of Jenga.

I do think there’s been a handful of sane voices in the debate: I was really impressed with David Goldhill’s “How American Health Care Killed My Father“, for example.

That being said, Lawrence sent me over to that territory I usually don’t tread in (for this link about what TV shows are popular among Republicans and Democrats) and I stumbled across another Atlantic article there: “God Help You. You’re on Dialysis.

I’m having trouble finding my way into writing about that, because there’s still some raw emotions involved. Also, what I saw involves the lives of some other people, who may not want their personal business spread all over the Internets.

That being said, much of what’s in that article rings a giant freaking bell. Infection control issues? Yes. “When patients do take on the system, they can pay a heavy price.” Oh, my, yes. Clinics pushing medication that they could charge Medicare for? You betcha. “The expanding grip of DaVita and Fresenius.” Yes, though to be fair, what else would you expect? If the Government is paying 100% of the cost for dialysis, they have an incentive to drive costs down as much as possible. If they drive down costs, the people who can even afford to provide the service in the first place are the ones who can cut costs and consolidate operations.

While I was composing this post, Instapundit linked to the article as well. The comments from the person who works in the industry are particularly interesting, I think.

No list of regulations can ever be the same as an interested local owner operator that wants to keep their clients happy and knows they could walk across the street and get better care at any time.

Obit watch.

Thursday, November 11th, 2010

Noted film producer Dino De Laurentiis has passed away.

In his honor, let’s look back at one of the high points of his career:

Art, damn it, art! watch (#18 in a series).

Thursday, November 11th, 2010

The LAT has a piece on the “Small Gift Los Angeles” exhibition in Santa Monica.

Celebrating the 50th anniversary of Sanrio, the event will include food trucks, miniature golf and a pop-up shop. The main draw is an art exhibition with nearly a dozen installation rooms and about 100 pieces by the likes of Paul Frank and Gary Baseman. For crafty types, the Japanese artist Naoshi will be teaching a workshop in how to render Hello Kitty with colored sand.

The link is worth checking out, especially for the included pictures. I find “Hello Topiary” a little scary, to be honest, but “Fishy Greetings” is kind of nifty.

Rotating 180 degrees away from Sanrio, the Guardian has an article on an exhibition in Berlin of sculptures confiscated by the Nazis. The sculptures in question were considered lost after the war, but were recently dug up during excavation for a new building.

These particular sculptures were apparently part of the Nazi campaign against “degenerate art”, and were included in the infamous “Entartete Kunst” exhibition. I’ve been fascinated by that exhibition since I first read about it in (of all places) Charles Willeford’s The Burnt Orange Heresy (not a spoiler: “Entartete Kunst” is only mentioned in passing). Somewhere in my collection I even have Degenerate Art, the catalog from the L.A. County Museum of Art’s attempt to recreate the exhibition.

Those thin lines.

Thursday, November 11th, 2010

I don’t really like just throwing up links to other people’s posts, at least without adding some commentary here.

But Matt G.’s post on the concept of “The Thin Blue Line” deserves highlighting, and I really can’t add anything to it except: this!

An officer who knowingly breaks the law is not a police officer; he’s a criminal who happens to have a badge. He’s not my “brother,” he’s someone that we need to get shed of our professional association. The Thin Blue Line concept doesn’t mean that I should protect a criminal officer; it means that I should take firm action against him.