Archive for November, 2010

Fashonistas.

Wednesday, November 17th, 2010

I wanted to link to this article on the Old Fashioned (hattip: Daring Fireball); I actually think this is a pretty well done take, and I was previously unfamiliar with the American Drink website.

The problem I have, though, is that the American Drink site seems to me to be annoyingly laid out and far more difficult to read than it should be.

I’m wondering if it might be time to revive the Society for the Preservation and Restoration of Classic Cocktails, in blog format; possibly even as a group blog. Glen? Mike? RoadRich? Would you guys be interested if I fired something like that up?

TMQ watch: November 16, 2010.

Tuesday, November 16th, 2010

Welcome back, Gregg. We missed you. Well, mostly, we missed the cheerleader pictures.

(more…)

No man is an Islander.

Monday, November 15th, 2010

And Scott Gordon is no longer coaching the New York Islanders.

I think I speak for many people when I say, “They still play professional hockey?”

Recent reading.

Monday, November 15th, 2010

My opinion of the Civil War is well known within my circle of friends. In brief, I find the Civil War for the most part a rather uninteresting area of history, and think far too much attention is given to it. I would rather see 1/10th of the amount of attention devoted to the Civil War given to the American Revolution. Or Vietnam. Or Prohibition. (Don’t ask me about the Compromise of 1850. Just don’t.)

That said, I was shocked at how much I liked James Swanson’s Manhunt: The 12-Day Chase for Lincoln’s Killer. I think part of the reason I enjoyed it so much is that Swanson chose to write his book more in the style of a true crime work, rather than a standard history. I’ve been waiting for his sequel, Bloody Crimes: The Chase for Jefferson Davis and the Death Pageant for Lincoln’s Corpse, since I finished Manhunt, and I’m happy to be able to say that Bloody Crimes is a worthy successor.

Swanson tells two parallel stories in Bloody Crimes. The first story is: what happened after Lincoln’s death? Swanson does give us some preliminary material about the last few days of Lincoln’s life: his visit to Richmond, his premonitions of death, and briefly recaps the assassination itself. But his main focus is on the after death pageant, the decision making that went into it, how it was pulled together, and how it was carried off. Part of Swanson’s argument is that Lincoln’s funeral train went a long way towards healing the wounds of the Civil War. The exhibition of Lincoln’s corpse, and the public grief that accompanied it, in some way gave the nation closure, and permission to mourn the Union’s Civil War dead. In some way, Lincoln wasn’t just a martyred president; he was a symbol of all the Union soldiers who fell, and his funeral train was exactly the national catharsis the United States needed at the time.

The other half of Swanson’s story is Jefferson Davis. What happened to him, and to the Confederacy, after Lee’s surrender? Davis was at one point the most wanted man in the country – probably even more so than Booth, while Booth was still alive – and his capture ended the Confederacy. Yet within two years of his capture, Davis had gone from “sure to be tried for treason and executed” to free man. What happened? And how did Davis live out the rest of his life? How do you go from leader of a free nation to private citizen, especially after you’ve lost much of your wealth in the war? I’ll confess that I really never thought about these questions with respect to the late Jefferson Davis, but Swanson answers them, and makes the answers interesting. One of Swanson’s great accomplishments in Bloody Crimes is that he manages to make Davis a sympathetic and honorable figure (as Swanson shows, Davis was more honorable than some of his captors) without apologizing for the Confederacy and what it stood for.

I commend Swanson’s books to your attention. But I do wonder what he’s going to write about next, now that he’s seemingly exhausted the possibilities of the late Civil War period?

Another recent book that I’ve mentioned previously, finally managed to find, and enjoyed the heck out of, is Max Watman’s Chasing the White Dog: An Amateur Outlaw’s Adventures in Moonshine. You might be surprised to know that there’s basically two branches of contemporary moonshine making. On the one hand, you’ve got contemporary American micro-distillers, some of whom are fully licensed (such as Stranahan’s Colorado Whiskey, which Watman covers in depth), and some of whom operate just outside the law thanks to stupid government regulations. (It is perfectly legal to produce up to 300 gallons of beer yearly for your own use. But God forbid that you try to distill your own booze, even for personal use; there’s no legal way to do that without expensive government licensing and paperwork.) On the other hand, you have the descendants of the old moonshiners in places like the Smith Mountain Lake area of Virginia, who are still producing shine and skirting the law. Except the shine that they produce now is of much lower quality: basically, industrial strength hooch designed to get you messed up fast and cheap, and sold mostly in poor urban areas. Watman does an excellent job of presenting the case for legalized micro-distilling, while at the same time acknowledging that moonshine production has lost much of the luster it had in the Junior Johnson days. (Yes, he does talk to Junior, who’s licensed his name to a fully legal micro-distiller, and is producing his own branded moonshine.) Watman also discusses his own adventures in moonshine production; he makes me want to see if I can find (or build) a small still of my own. (A quick search of Smartflix does not turn up any how-to videos on still building, though, darn the luck.)

Watman’s book also gets an enthusiastic recommendation from me.

Class acts.

Monday, November 15th, 2010

Friday’s XKCD started me thinking.

Here’s Randall Munroe, who’s established a pretty significant business providing content for free. He’s facing a tough family situation, so what does he do? He explains what’s going on to folks, providing as much detail as he’s comfortable with, thanks people for their support, and basically promises to keep on as best as he can.

Randall Munroe is a class act. Randall Munroe makes me want to buy stuff from his store.  (And today’s XKCD is pretty funny. Or maybe I’m just a sucker for Wagner references.)

When Ryan North goes on vacation, or on his honeymoon, he recruits guest artists for his comic. And a lot of them are pretty darn good. Ryan North is a class act. Ryan North makes me want to buy stuff from his store.

The Penny Arcade guys would probably be embarrassed by someone describing them as a class act, but look at what they do when they need time, or are busy at a con; or heck, look at what they do during the holidays.

There’s another web comic I read. It used to run five days a week. Then it started drifting down to four days a week. Then the artist had some personal issues and posted reruns for a while. Then he came back. It started drifting down to three days a week. Then two. Then once a week while he worked on other projects. Right now, it was last updated over a week ago. Two weeks elapsed between that update and the previous one, and a little more than two weeks between updates before that.

“He does it for free! How dare you complain?” Well, maybe. But right now he’s running a fund drive. In addition, part of his business model is providing premium content as an adjunct to the free webcomic. When he goes radio silent for weeks on end, what motivation do I have to pay for premium content, or donate money? Or even to keep reading his webcomic?

I feel like I’m coming perilously close to crossing a line. I don’t think artists have an obligation to keep providing stuff for free, forever. I can understand people becoming overwhelmed. But there’s a good way to handle that; the Randall Munroe way.

Your loser update: week 10.

Monday, November 15th, 2010

It was a lousy week in the NFL, at least from my perspective.

Dallas won (what the heck? Was dumping Wade really all they needed?), Houston lost (what is this I don’t even), and sadly…

NFL teams that still have a chance to go 0-16:

None.

Count on the Lions to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Bright spot: Minnesota got stomped, so I’m still holding out hope for another coach firing, and possibly even the benching of Brett Favre.

Quote of the day.

Friday, November 12th, 2010

Other business owners were able to open BBB accounts for Hamas and the white supremacist website Stormfront with “A” grades by paying membership fees. To be fair, those organizations are top-notch at providing customer service, so long as the service you are looking for is getting murdered or reviled based on your race.

—Ken @ Popehat. Context here.

Head. Splody.

Friday, November 12th, 2010

So let me see if I understand this NYT article correctly:

The “SoHo” district of NYC has a rule that allows people to live in lofts in SoHo, provided that they are “artists”.

Saying that you’re an “artist” isn’t good enough: there’s actually a city certification process for artists. For example, Jon Bon Jovi is a city certified artist.

Up until recently, the “artist” requirement seems to have been honored on a “wink and a nudge” basis. But now, banks, co-op boards, and the city have started cracking down.

And the process for become a NYC certified artist is somewhat mysterious:

It has never been entirely clear who qualifies as an artist; the applications and even the names of the two judges who decide are not available to the public. Some SoHo residents have questioned how Mr. Bon Jovi and the hotelier André Balazs, among others, could obtain certification, since neither would seem to require a SoHo space for their work, one of the major criteria for certification, along with educational credentials and a body of work that has been displayed and written about in the previous five years.

The Department of Cultural Affairs has certified roughly 3,400 artists since 1971, but the number of applicants shrank as the lofts filled out and the requirements began to be ignored. From 2003 to 2008, the department certified 164 artists and rejected 11.

But in 2009, the department accepted 14 artists and rejected 14. This year there have been 6 rejections and 14 acceptances.

The judges rejected a jewelry maker for producing work that was too commercial and a photographer whose pieces did not show enough “focus, quality and commitment.” Others were turned down for being a student, a “hobbyist” or an “interpretive artist.”

Am I missing something?

Sigh.

Thursday, November 11th, 2010

There are two things I generally avoid.

  1. Reading articles linked from the FARK politics tab, and the FARK comment threads on those articles. I don’t need more rage in my life.
  2. Blogging about health care, and health care reform. Look, I think the system has major problems. I wish I knew how to fix it. I don’t. I think things are too deeply intertwingled for there to be a single easy fix, or even a series of easy fixes. I’m worried that once you start tugging on the pieces, the entire thing will collapse like a giant game of Jenga.

I do think there’s been a handful of sane voices in the debate: I was really impressed with David Goldhill’s “How American Health Care Killed My Father“, for example.

That being said, Lawrence sent me over to that territory I usually don’t tread in (for this link about what TV shows are popular among Republicans and Democrats) and I stumbled across another Atlantic article there: “God Help You. You’re on Dialysis.

I’m having trouble finding my way into writing about that, because there’s still some raw emotions involved. Also, what I saw involves the lives of some other people, who may not want their personal business spread all over the Internets.

That being said, much of what’s in that article rings a giant freaking bell. Infection control issues? Yes. “When patients do take on the system, they can pay a heavy price.” Oh, my, yes. Clinics pushing medication that they could charge Medicare for? You betcha. “The expanding grip of DaVita and Fresenius.” Yes, though to be fair, what else would you expect? If the Government is paying 100% of the cost for dialysis, they have an incentive to drive costs down as much as possible. If they drive down costs, the people who can even afford to provide the service in the first place are the ones who can cut costs and consolidate operations.

While I was composing this post, Instapundit linked to the article as well. The comments from the person who works in the industry are particularly interesting, I think.

No list of regulations can ever be the same as an interested local owner operator that wants to keep their clients happy and knows they could walk across the street and get better care at any time.

Obit watch.

Thursday, November 11th, 2010

Noted film producer Dino De Laurentiis has passed away.

In his honor, let’s look back at one of the high points of his career:

Art, damn it, art! watch (#18 in a series).

Thursday, November 11th, 2010

The LAT has a piece on the “Small Gift Los Angeles” exhibition in Santa Monica.

Celebrating the 50th anniversary of Sanrio, the event will include food trucks, miniature golf and a pop-up shop. The main draw is an art exhibition with nearly a dozen installation rooms and about 100 pieces by the likes of Paul Frank and Gary Baseman. For crafty types, the Japanese artist Naoshi will be teaching a workshop in how to render Hello Kitty with colored sand.

The link is worth checking out, especially for the included pictures. I find “Hello Topiary” a little scary, to be honest, but “Fishy Greetings” is kind of nifty.

Rotating 180 degrees away from Sanrio, the Guardian has an article on an exhibition in Berlin of sculptures confiscated by the Nazis. The sculptures in question were considered lost after the war, but were recently dug up during excavation for a new building.

These particular sculptures were apparently part of the Nazi campaign against “degenerate art”, and were included in the infamous “Entartete Kunst” exhibition. I’ve been fascinated by that exhibition since I first read about it in (of all places) Charles Willeford’s The Burnt Orange Heresy (not a spoiler: “Entartete Kunst” is only mentioned in passing). Somewhere in my collection I even have Degenerate Art, the catalog from the L.A. County Museum of Art’s attempt to recreate the exhibition.

Those thin lines.

Thursday, November 11th, 2010

I don’t really like just throwing up links to other people’s posts, at least without adding some commentary here.

But Matt G.’s post on the concept of “The Thin Blue Line” deserves highlighting, and I really can’t add anything to it except: this!

An officer who knowingly breaks the law is not a police officer; he’s a criminal who happens to have a badge. He’s not my “brother,” he’s someone that we need to get shed of our professional association. The Thin Blue Line concept doesn’t mean that I should protect a criminal officer; it means that I should take firm action against him.