Archive for August, 2010

More photos about architecture.

Sunday, August 22nd, 2010

I’ve been trying to get the photos from my recent trips organized and put together for Flickr purposes. Here’s the first set, which contains some photos of a Frank Gehry designed building in Las Vegas (and a couple of other buildings, too):

Ruvo Center and other buildings July 2010.

I’m still learning how to use the Nikon. There’s a fair number of photos in this set where I did one photo with the camera set to full-auto exposure mode, and a second photo in the same position with the camera set to aperture priority and stopped down to f/22 or smaller, so I could get a sense of depth of field. (Most of these were taken with the 18-55 mm Nikon kit lens: I think I used the 80-200 mm VR lens for the Stratosphere/pyramid photos.)

Comments either here or on Flickr are welcome.

Friday loser update.

Friday, August 20th, 2010

Pittsburgh continues the downward spiral: 40-81, .331 winning percentage, 53.622 projected wins.  Not 110 losses yet, but if trends continue (note that they were 39-75 a week ago, and are on a three game losing streak) that goal is in sight.

Balmer’s 43-79, .352 winning percentage, 57.024 projected wins.

And Houston’s at 53-67, .442 winning percentage, 71.604 projected wins. They may come closer to a .500 finish that I expected at the start of the season.

Random notes: August 19, 2010.

Thursday, August 19th, 2010

The NYT is all over Philadelphia’s efforts to save three historic ships: the Olympia, the United States, and the battleship New Jersey.

The New Jersey does not actually seem to be in any danger, except from government cutbacks. People have been trying to save the United States for years, but there just doesn’t seem to be that much enthusiasm; the current plan is for a conservancy to purchase it, and convince someone to turn it into a hotel, casino, or other project.

Of the three ships, the Olympia seems to be the most endangered and most important. What’s interesting to me about the NYT article is that:

  1. Various bloggers were on this story months ago.
  2. The NYT doesn’t mention the embezzlement scandal, which may have had something to do with the inability to keep the Olympia running.

The NYT is also on the case if you want to spend six figures on a fish tank. But what if you don’t? The NYT is there for you, too, with some options in the four and even three figure range.

Into the Wild fan dies trying to find the bus. I really, really want to say something snarky here, but I just can’t.

Random gun crankery.

Wednesday, August 18th, 2010

A post by Sebastian led us to this post at the Defensive Handgun Blog, about the possible legal issues associated with using an Evil Black Rifle in self-defense. (I’d actually be more concerned about over-penetration in an apartment than the legal issues, but I’ve heard other people say that .223 tends to break up and not go through sheet rock. Does anyone have some definitive knowledge on this?)

A link in that post, in turn, led us to one of our favorite tales from “The Ayoob Files” feature in American Handgunner: the story of Gary Fadden, or as Mr. Ayoob puts it, “F— you and your high powered rifle!” As a matter of fact, we were just thinking about this story the other night, and are delighted to find a linkable online version.

Short version of the story: Mr. Fadden and his fiancee were out for a Sunday drive when they got into a confrontation with a group of bikers. The bikers chased Mr. Fadden and his beloved for over 20 miles (this was prior to ubiquitous cellphones) before Mr. Fadden decided to make a stand at his office.

Mr. Fadden’s office was at the Heckler and Koch plant, where he worked as a salesman for H&K. In the truck with him was a legally-owned personal Ruger AC556 (the full-auto version of the Mini-14; one question that isn’t answered in the article is why a salesman for H&K was using a Ruger product, but we figure that’s none of our beeswax). Mr. Fadden made his stand, fired a warning burst into the air, the biker uttered the phrase that pays (quoted above), charged Mr. Fadden, and Mr. Fadden put a six-round burst into the biker, killing him deader than the box office of “Scott Pilgrim vs. The World”.

What makes this story interesting is that the local prosecutor, who was apparently up in arms that someone would use a full-auto rifle in self-defense (as opposed to an engraved Perazzi over/under, perhaps), chose to charge Mr. Fadden with first degree murder. Mr. Fadden was found not guilty in a somewhat unusual trial (an undercover police detective actually broke his cover and testified in Mr. Fadden’s defense; the prosecutor spent so much time waving the AC556 around that the judge actually gave special instructions to the jury), which resulted in the local prosecutor throwing another temper tantrum.

We commend both Mr. Ayoob’s article and the one at the Defensive Handgun Blog to your attention.

In other news (blogged elsewhere, too, but we can’t let it pass without comment) the WP has discovered that people in other parts of the country do things differently. For example, some of them carry…guns! And they take their kids shooting! (The WP user poll, “Should parents teach their children to use guns?” is running 87% “Yes” at the time I write this.)

This has also been blogged in a few other places, but we did want to highlight this post by David Kopel over at the Volokh Conspiracy about the latest questionable activity by the Obama administration; blocking South Korea’s efforts to sell 100,000 surplus antique rifles in the United States.

The smell of leather, safety pins, and desperation.

Wednesday, August 18th, 2010

The Sex Pistols have created their own perfume.

Hookers, blow, and police professionalism.

Wednesday, August 18th, 2010

I have been somewhat negligent in covering the trial of Scott Lando, which ended yesterday.

Mr. Lando was a former officer with the Austin Police Department; he was commended at one time for bravery, and for making the most arrests in his sector. However, things went south for some reason, and Officer Lando was fired in 2008.

Former Officer Lando has been accused of various charges, including aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and prostitution. However, in this particular case, he was charged only with four drug charges; Lando was accused of giving crack and money to hookers and their “boyfriends”.

Interestingly, three of the four drug charges were dismissed by the judge before they even reached the jury, due to insufficient evidence. After deliberating for two days, and telling the judge twice that they were hopelessly deadlocked, the jury finally convicted Lando on the one remaining charge; that he gave crack to the “boyfriend” of a hooker he met while on patrol.

The trial featured some rather sensational allegations; specifically, hookers claiming that Lando brought them to his house, had “unprotected sex” with them (note that it isn’t bad enough that Lando just had sex with hookers; it has to be spelled out that it was unprotected sex) and gave one of the hookers a pair of Harley Davidson motorcycle boots that belonged to his wife.

Speaking of Mrs. Lando, she’s stood by her man the whole time, claiming that the hookers in question broke into her house and stole her stuff.

Something stinks here, but I’m not sure what. When you go to trial on four charges, the judge throws out three of them before they even reach the jury, and the jury is deadlocked on the last one…

Recent SDC updates.

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

Added July and August (to date, as far as I can go) of 2010.

I’m making a push to get the SDC logs completely updated before Armadillocon.

Interesting moral questions from the LAT.

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

Is it okay to tattoo a seven-year old child?

Is it okay to tattoo a seven-year old child if at least one parent gives consent?

Does it make a difference if the seven-year old child allegedly begged and pleaded until the parent gave in? (Note that this fact is disputed; the father claims this, but the child’s mother claimed that he was held down and forcibly tattooed. The child himself testified at the ensuing criminal trial that he didn’t want the tattoo and cried throughout.)

Does it make a difference that the tattoo was a gang symbol, and both the father and the tattoo artist were members of that particular gang?

If any of these things do make a difference, what’s an appropriate charge? Aggravated mayhem? Injury to a child? Felony f-ing stupid?

Who bears more of the responsibility here? Certainly, you’d expect the parent to be the bigger party here and say, “I don’t care how much you whine, I’m not letting you get a tattoo.” But we all know there are parents who give in to whatever their kid wants. And it’s easy to imagine a parent who says, “Hey, what’s the big deal with a tattoo?” Does the tattoo artist have a duty to say, “I don’t care what the parents say, I’m not tattooing a freakin’ seven year old”?

Edited to add: Speaking of irresponsible parenting and art, Patrick over at Popehat makes an interesting argument that Rachel Stieringer is a more important artist than Andres Serrano. For those of you who are unfamiliar with Ms. Stieringer and her artistic output, I won’t spoil it for you; I’ll just encourage you to click over to Patrick’s blog entry.

TMQ watch: August 17, 2010.

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

It’s the most wonderful time of the year.

That is, the start of football season. (Yes, the loser update will return this year.)

And with the start of football season comes the return of the tastefully named Gregg Easterbrook and his “Tuesday Morning Quarterback” column for ESPN.

Don’t get me wrong; I enjoy Easterbrook’s column. I’ve been reading it since he was over at Slate, and find it to be one of the high points of my week during the period it runs. But I’ve been thinking for a while now that someone needs to highlight and respond to various things in TMQ.

Sometimes, Easterbrook does good work; he spent much of last season discussing the NFL’s response to head trauma among pro athletes, and I felt he was right on target. Sometimes, he uses his column to argue for things like increased Federal vehicle mileage requirements, and I think someone needs to respond to those arguments. Sometimes, he uses his column to go off on various SF TV shows for their lack of plausibility. And sometimes, Easterbrook just goes completely off the damn rails.

So I’m introducing the “Tuesday Morning Quarterback Watch”, to highlight when the man’s right, when I think he’s wrong, when I think he’s completely nuts, and some of Easterbrook’s odd obsessions.

In today’s TMQ:

  • Easterbrook argues that the outcomes of sporting events should never be reversed, except if an incorrect call occurs on the final play and a correct call would have resulted in a win for the opposing team. I haven’t heard anyone seriously argue a different viewpoint; I highlight this because I’m wondering if it will be one of his obsessions this season.
  • Wacky food and/or drink? Check. In this case, the Friendly’s cheeseburger served between two grilled cheese sandwiches. “At this restaurant, a lunch of Loaded Waffle Fries, Buffalo Chicken Supermelt and a milkshake weighs in at 3,670 calories.” I’m pretty dubious than anyone would order all three of those and try to eat them solo (though I will admit, that Buffalo Chicken Supermelt by itself doesn’t look terribly healthy). And do you really expect healthy food at a place with the slogan “Where ice cream makes the meal”?
  • “How long until babe spy Anna Chapman signs to play Natasha Fatale in a big-budget remake of “Rocky & Bullwinkle”?” Well, Gregg (can I call you “Gregg”?), given the utter failure of the last big-budget “Rocky and Bullwinkle” remake, I’m going to suggest that you look for this around the same time as David Letterman’s “Cold Day in Hell Special”.
  • Easterbrook kicks LeBron James around, but curiously, not ESPN for broadcasting the fiasco.
  • Easterbrook spends 699 words out of an 8,748 word column (about 8%) recapping NYT corrections from the NFL off season. Not sports related corrections; just NYT corrections in general. Dear Mr. Easterbrook; have you ever heard of “Regret the Error“? Or “The NYTPicker“?
  • Easterbrook finds an excuse to run a swimsuit photo of an attractive woman. No complaints here…
  • Easterbrook kicks Robert Byrd around some more.
  • Weasel coach bashing? Check.
  • Easterbrook kicks Al and Tipper Gore around some more. I would have held off on the “Al listens to rap music” joke, Gregg; the Onion beat you to it, and did it better.
  • Obligatory bashing of SF television shows? Check.
  • Wacky lawsuits? Check. I’ll give Easterbrook this: he may lean to the left politically, but he isn’t a blind liberal hack.
  • Easterbrook keeps threatening to retire the “Christmas Creep” watch, but hasn’t yet.

We’re fairly early into the NFL and TMQ season. So far, I haven’t detected any trends, but we’ll see how things go.

Oh, almost forgot! In addition to the normal TMQ column, we now have…the TMQ Trailer on Monday! How swell is that? For his first outing, Easterbrook uses the failure of JaMarcus Russell (“Ryan Leaf can relax — JaMarcus Russell has replaced him as the worst draft bust.” Can’t argue too much with that, Gregg.) as a jumping off point to “reimagine” the 2007 NFL draft, based on what we know now. I’m not sure what the point of this exercise is, except to highlight another Easterbrook trope (first-round draft choices, especially quarterbacks, are often overrated; most teams would be better served trading down to get second or third round choices) but it is mildly diverting.

The banshee screams for antelope meat.

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

From the police blotter: our local sheriff’s office busted a couple for breaking into a place called “Wild Bubba’s Wild Game Grill” (no, really!) in Del Valle.

Our fun couple, the female half of which goes by the name “Amber”, are accused of prying open the front door and stealing:

  • a bottle of Tito’s vodka. Well, I give them some credit for stealing good vodka, but wouldn’t it have been easier to hit a liquor store? There’s no shortage of them out that way.
  • a TV and VCR. Shoot, guys, you probably could have picked those up at a garage sale, if not the Goodwill.
  • and 25 pounds of beef, buffalo, and antelope meat.

For this, “Amber” and her guy pal are facing felony burglary charges. As Jay G. says, “Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.”

More interesting to me, though, is the very existence of Wild Bubba’s, which had previously escaped my notice. I sense a road trip coming on in the next few weeks (as soon as some things get resolved and some scheduled events pass).

Random hysterical notes.

Monday, August 16th, 2010

Interestingly, today is both:

The second link is by way of FARK. I was not aware until fairly recently that Kittinger not only held the record for highest parachute jump, he was also shot down over Vietnam and spent 11 months as a prisoner of war.

Ordinarily, I would suggest that someone needs to write a biography of Colonel Kittinger (he was a captain at the time of the jump, but retired from the Air Force as a colonel). But wait! Somebody has! (I have that book, but have not had a chance to read it yet. Craig Ryan’s The Pre-Astronauts: Manned Ballooning on the Threshold of Space is a pretty spiffy book, though, so I expect his work on Kittinger’s autobiography to be just as good.)

Random notes: August 16, 2010.

Monday, August 16th, 2010

Obit watch: James J. Kilpatrick.

For those who are wondering, I’ll save you the trouble: I couldn’t find any “Point-Counterpoint” videos on YouTube, and Shana Alexander died in 2005.

In other news, Austin’s MetroRail service was disrupted this morning. Why? Well, someone found a mysterious package on the tracks that contained…a cow tongue studded with nails, along with a note (“incoherent”, according to the Statesman), and a photograph. There was also a glass jar found nearby with an unidentified liquid inside.

Edited to add: Lawrence sends along this link to cow tongues found nailed to trees at Prospect Park around this time last year. Speculation in the linked article is that this is some sort of Santeria ritual intended to stop gossip, which seems to fit in with speculation by Statesmen commentators.