…here’s the link to the Wikipedia entry on Heil Honey I’m Home!
Edited to add: Lawrence provides us with a link. And a warning: “Some two and a half minutes in, it’s actually worse than it sounds.”
Yeah. I lasted about three and a half minutes.
Archive for August 21st, 2009
For the folks who were at dinner tonight…
Friday, August 21st, 2009Clippings: August 21, 2009
Friday, August 21st, 2009Pulitzer-prize winning automotive writer Dan Neil has a good piece in the LAT on “Which of today’s clunkers will become tomorrow’s classic cars?“. It gets especially funny when he talks about a 1971 Monte Carlo going at auction for $60,000. (“…Spot-welded together with the craftsmanship one might expect of unsupervised political prisoners…”) There’s also a followup here with some more classic candidates.
I’m with Neil on many of these choices. I’ve poked my share of fun at the Aztec, but if I could pick a used one in good shape up cheap, I’d consider it (especially with the tent). Likewise, I’d be willing to consider the Volvo or the S320 (but I’d worry that upkeep on the S320 would eat me alive).
Two more interesting stories by way of Overlawyered: a WSJ story on the Nicaraguan banana pesticide lawsuit fraud mentioned here previously, and a Fortune story about alleged massive medical fraud in Las Vegas involving both doctors and trial lawyers:
According to government evidence, the group coordinated their testimony as expert witnesses, lied under oath, protected one another from malpractice lawsuits — even after the surgeries left a few patients paralyzed — and ate away at the plaintiffs’ settlement money with kickbacks disguised as contingency fees.
One of the problems, however, is that the government has failed to actually prove their case so far.