Saturday was a little calmer than Friday from my perspective. Part of the reason for that may have been Adam Savage‘s talk (and the meet and greet afterwards) took a lot of folks out of circulation for two or three hours. (I didn’t go.)
More quick takes:
“Hacker vs. Disasters Large & Small”: Michael Schearer, who did the first part of the presentation, also did the Hacker In Iraq presentation. As a Naval officer, he went through SERE school, so he’s got some hands-on survival experience which makes him worth paying attention to. Schearer’s part of the presentation basically covered short-term wilderness survival (as in, “I’m cold and there are wolves after me.“) and was more practical. Renderman’s half of the presentation was a more long-term, “How do we survive and rebuild society after the Big One?”, philosophical presentation. (Edited to add: links to the final versions of the slides; Part 1, Part 2.)
Key takeaways:
- “Hacker skills are largely compatible with the skills necessary to survive in the wilderness or during a natural disaster.”
- “Don’t be squeamish about breaking or destroying something to help you stay alive.”
- “You are not Jack Bauer, MacGuyver, or Survivorman; you need practice to survive.”
“Personal Survival Preparedness”: Nice guy, okay talk, mostly dealing with survival in an urban environment after some devastating event (Katrina or worse).
“Picking Electronic Locks Using TCP Sequence Prediction”: Excellent presentation, short, and scary. Brief summary: many electronic lock systems are IP based and the traffic on the network is not encrypted. This makes the locks vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack (to capture an unlock command) and a replay attack with a spoofed TCP sequence number (to replay the command). These attacks bypass the existing control software, so the spoofed unlock command leaves no audit trail. The author is a network admin at Texas State University; woo hoo! Greater Austin/San Marcos Metropolitan Area represent!
“Sniff Keystrokes With Lasers/Voltmeters”: Two pretty amusing guys with another excellent presentation. In the first half, they presented an attack on PS/2 keyboards with very simple hardware; all you need is a slightly hacked power cord connected to a common circuit with the computer in question on one end, and an ADC plus a micro-controller (for data acquisition, filtering, and storage) on the other and viola! In the second half, they outlined a acoustic-based attack that builds on previous research, combined with microphone hardware using freaking laser beams. As the authors said, “How cool is that?”
Key takeaway: “girls will melt when you show this…”
“Bluetooth, Smells Like Chicken”: Pretty much what I expected from the summary. Using software-defined radio gear (about $1000) you can monitor the Bluetooth frequencies. Bluetooth does frequency hopping over about 79 MHz, and the software-defined radio gear can only monitor about 25 MHz (max) at one time. But you can monitor one channel and use information from that packet to actually predict the frequency hopping cycle. The authors also presented a technique that allows aliasing of the entire Bluetooth spectrum to the 25 MHz available in the radio gear they were using without compromising the ability to extract packets. Finally, they discussed Bluetooth attacks using off-the-shelf sub-$10 hardware to sample and inject data.
Key takeaway: there is no longer any such thing as a non-discoverable Bluetooth device.
